Dear Sirs,
I am very sorry to trouble often. If I execute >>a=[] >>b=sum(a) The result becomes b=[]. Is this specification of octave? I expected b became zero like MATLAB. I sent two other mails to [hidden email] already. 1. The results of expm are strange. Does the problem occure only on my system? 2. Is there any way to execute external programs from octave? 3. Is there any way to get ASCII code of each character in a string? I am looking forward to getting reply from you. Yoshihiro Hashimoto Dept. of Systems Eng., Nagoya Inst. of Tech. [hidden email] [Now]Dept. of Chem. Eng., The Univ. of Leeds [hidden email] -------------------------------------------------------------- The mail to [hidden email] will be sent to [hidden email] automatically. |
: If I execute
: >>a=[] : >>b=sum(a) : The result becomes b=[]. : Is this specification of octave? It seems to me that any operation on an empty matrix should either give you an error, or it should return an empty matrix. You can choose which you prefer by setting the value of the built-in variable `propagate_empty_matrices' to either "true", "false", or "warn". I suppose that a case could be made for treating the summation and product functions as special cases (product should return 1?), but I think it is probably better to try to avoid doing operations on empty matrices. : I expected b became zero like MATLAB. I didn't know that Matlab returned 0. Are you sure that's not a bug in Matlab? Are there very many places where this is really useful? -- John W. Eaton | The exam demonstrates a comminuted, slightly overlapping [hidden email] | angulated fracture of the midfifth metatarsal. |
In reply to this post by che6yoh
: > I think, octave uses eigenvectors to calculate expm, it could fail for
: > some ill matrice. Yes, Octave currently uses a fairly simple method based on eigenvalues and eigenvectors to compute expm, logm, and sqrtm. It's clearly not sufficient, and needs to be improved. : > However, MATLAB built-in expm function uses more general : > and reliable algorithm. Does anyone have a reference for the method used by Matlab? I have a copy of Moler and Van Loan's paper `Nineteen dubious ways to compute the exponential of a matrix', but it seems that there is some kind of problem with every method, and that there is no clearly superior way to do this computation. Does anyone know of newer or better methods? -- John W. Eaton | The exam demonstrates a comminuted, slightly overlapping [hidden email] | angulated fracture of the midfifth metatarsal. |
In reply to this post by John Eaton-3
I am sorry to answer late.
>:sum([]) >: I expected b became zero like MATLAB. > >I didn't know that Matlab returned 0. Are you sure that's not a bug >in Matlab? > >Are there very many places where this is really useful? In MATLAB Identification Toolbox, it is used very often. I could understand that sum([])=[] was better than sum([])=0. It is not neccessary for me to get 0 as the result of sum([]). ABS('string') and SETSTR(vector) is used to contain many system parameters into one matrix in MATALB Toolboxes. The type of a model is expressed in a string. It is contained in a parameter matrix using ASCII codes. I wanted to use many results of MATLAB in octave. Are there many toolboxes which are still freeware and can be used in octave? Yoshihiro Hashimoto Dept. of Systems Eng., Nagoya Inst. of Tech. [hidden email] [Now]Dept. of Chem. Eng., The Univ. of Leeds [hidden email] -------------------------------------------------------------- The mail to [hidden email] will be sent to [hidden email] automatically. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |