quick question - over the weekend I ran into a
matlab compatibility issue with griddata and in making a
patch saw a bug in griddata3. The patch I submitted
addresses both.
Would it be preferred if I separated them? One
doesn't exactly depend on the other. The bug fix is simple
and independent. The compat patch calls griddata3, so if it
were pushed without the bugfix, griddata would then exhibit
the same bug as griddata3. Given that, I lumped them into
the single patch attached to the tracker.
If separate is preferred, i can update it and
submit two.
Generally it is best to have one bug per problem, so if you could
separate them that would be good.
Regarding griddata, griddata3 and griddatan, Matlab originally had
2-D, 3-D, and N-D implementations of several functions such as
delaunay (delaunay, delaunay3, delaunayn). They have have been
moving towards a combined 2-D/3-D function and an N-D implementation
and deprecating the 3-D specific version. Matlab is a moving
target, but we can probably follow this and deprecate griddata3 and
move the functionality in to griddata.m for the next release.
--Rik
Locked
