hello friends, _______________________________________________ Help-octave mailing list Help-octave@... https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/help-octave |
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 5:02 PM, george.brida <[hidden email]> wrote:
Take a look at min help min mm=min(min(a))) [i,ij] =find (a==mm) Doug Stewart _______________________________________________ Help-octave mailing list [hidden email] https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/help-octave |
man, 20 12 2010 kl. 17:23 -0500, skrev Doug Stewart:
> > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 5:02 PM, george.brida > <[hidden email]> wrote: > hello friends, > is there a function that gives a minimum a(i, j) of the > elements of a matrix and the corresponding number of rows and > column (ie it returns the values of i and j). > Thank you in advance. > George. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Help-octave mailing list > [hidden email] > https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/help-octave > > > Take a look at min > help min > > > mm=min(min(a))) > [i,ij] =find (a==mm) Or alternatively: [val, idx] = min (A (:)); [i, j] = ind2sub (size (A), idx); Søren _______________________________________________ Help-octave mailing list [hidden email] https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/help-octave |
Am Montag, 20. Dezember 2010, 23:44:58 schrieb Søren Hauberg:
> man, 20 12 2010 kl. 17:23 -0500, skrev Doug Stewart: > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 5:02 PM, george.brida > > > > <[hidden email]> wrote: > > hello friends, > > is there a function that gives a minimum a(i, j) of the > > elements of a matrix and the corresponding number of rows and > > column (ie it returns the values of i and j). > > Thank you in advance. > > George. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Help-octave mailing list > > [hidden email] > > https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/help-octave > > > > Take a look at min > > help min > > > > > > mm=min(min(a))) > > [i,ij] =find (a==mm) > > Or alternatively: > > [val, idx] = min (A (:)); > [i, j] = ind2sub (size (A), idx); > > Søren > pairs are of interest where the matrix has its minimum value: val = min(A(:)); [i,j] =ind2sub(size(A),find(A==val)); _______________________________________________ Help-octave mailing list [hidden email] https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/help-octave |
The problem with 'find' is that it may return a vector instead of a scalar. What about: [idxi, idxj] = min(A, [], 2); %# iterates on lines -- returns vectors [Amin, idxi] = min(idxi); %# mimimum value and row index idxj = idxj(idxi); %# column index |
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:00 AM, CdeMills <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > Martin Helm wrote: >> >> >>> >> This will show the first element which has the minimum value. If all index >> pairs are of interest where the matrix has its minimum value: >> >> val = min(A(:)); >> [i,j] =ind2sub(size(A),find(A==val)); >> >> > > The problem with 'find' is that it may return a vector instead of a scalar. So what? ind2sub can perfectly handle a vector as well. _______________________________________________ Help-octave mailing list [hidden email] https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave |
Am Montag, 27. Dezember 2010, 10:52:56 schrieb Jaroslav Hajek:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:00 AM, CdeMills <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Martin Helm wrote: > >> This will show the first element which has the minimum value. If all > >> index pairs are of interest where the matrix has its minimum value: > >> > >> val = min(A(:)); > >> [i,j] =ind2sub(size(A),find(A==val)); > > > > The problem with 'find' is that it may return a vector instead of a > > scalar. > > So what? ind2sub can perfectly handle a vector as well. I also do not really understand why the vector should be a problem. Btw my ind2sub in the example is completely superflous. Doug Stewart already gave the simpler syntax which does the same, since find is clever enough to output the right result when called with two result parameters [i, j] = find(A==val) which is less noisy. I somehow did not notice that before. _______________________________________________ Help-octave mailing list [hidden email] https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave |
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Martin Helm <[hidden email]> wrote:
> Am Montag, 27. Dezember 2010, 10:52:56 schrieb Jaroslav Hajek: >> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:00 AM, CdeMills <[hidden email]> > wrote: >> > Martin Helm wrote: >> >> This will show the first element which has the minimum value. If all >> >> index pairs are of interest where the matrix has its minimum value: >> >> >> >> val = min(A(:)); >> >> [i,j] =ind2sub(size(A),find(A==val)); >> > >> > The problem with 'find' is that it may return a vector instead of a >> > scalar. >> >> So what? ind2sub can perfectly handle a vector as well. > > I also do not really understand why the vector should be a problem. Btw my > ind2sub in the example is completely superflous. Doug Stewart already gave the > simpler syntax which does the same, since find is clever enough to output the > right result when called with two result parameters > > [i, j] = find(A==val) > > which is less noisy. I somehow did not notice that before. > The downside of it is that it doesn't generalize to >2D arrays. _______________________________________________ Help-octave mailing list [hidden email] https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |